Hi Mikael,
Thank you for your reply. For the time being I am not in a hurry to solve the
issue with placeformula (when the numbers are on the right, there is no
problem…).
Best regards: Otared
> On 12 Jul 2022, at 23:08, Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context
> wrote:
> […]
&g
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 6:34 PM Otared Kavian via ntg-context
wrote:
>
> Dear Hans, dear Mikael,
>
> In my experiments with the new math engine, I noticed that there is an issue
> with \placeformula when one sets the location of the numbers on the left: the
> number
Dear Hans, dear Mikael,
In my experiments with the new math engine, I noticed that there is an issue
with \placeformula when one sets the location of the numbers on the left: the
number is one line above the formula. Here is a minimal example:
% begin bug-placeformula-left.tex
\setupformulas
2020 a la(s) 14:20, Jean-Philippe Rey (
jean-philippe@centralesupelec.fr) escribió:
> Dear list,
>
> \placeformula doesn't seem to work with LMTX.
>
> ==
> \starttext
> \placeformula[F]
> \startformula
> a^2 + b^2 = c^2
> \stopformula
>
&
Dear list,
\placeformula doesn't seem to work with LMTX.
==
\starttext
\placeformula[F]
\startformula
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
\stopformula
The \in[F] formula
\stoptext
==
Thank you for your help.
--
Jean-Philippe Rey
jean-philippe@centralesupelec.fr
91192 Gif-sur
Hi Henri,
Your are right there is an issue with \startmathcases…\stopmathcases: the
equations are not numbered when using this structure.
As a temporary solution you can use \startmatrix…\stopmatrix as in the
following, or you can define your own \startalignedcases.
\starttext
\placeformula
Dear list,
this formula is not numbered even though it should be. Please fix.
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\startmathcases
\NC 0 \NC $\mu > 2t$ \NR
\NC \pi/2 \NC $\mu = 2t$ \NR
\NC \pi \NC $\mu < 2t$ \NR
\stopmathcases
\stopformula
\stoptext
Cheers,
Hi Hans,
Thanks a lot for having fixed the issue I was reporting.
Unfortunately I found another issue related to placeformula and alignment in
math mode.
In the following example the use of \startalign in a \placeformula triggers a
weird behavior in the sense that the following instance
On 7/4/2016 11:11 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Below is an example (sorry if it is not absolutely minimal: I ran into this bug
when updating a lecture notes which uses a left frame around \proclaim stuff).
I attach the PDF showing the problem. I wonder whether this is related to the
new features
Hi Hans,
It seems that there is a bug in the latest beta (ConTeXt vesion: 2016.07.01
16:28) when using \placeformula with a framed text environment. The numbers for
the formulas are placed incorrectly, on the left as well as on the right.
Also, as one may see in the example below the numbering
On 30-11-2010 8:10, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hi Hans,
a fix for strc-mat.mkiv
\unexpanded\def\placeformula
- {\doglobal\settrue\insideplaceformula
+ {\global\settrue\insideplaceformula
\settrue\incrementformulanumber
\dodoubleempty\doplaceformula}
\unexpanded\def\placesubformula
Hi Hans,
a fix for strc-mat.mkiv
\unexpanded\def\placeformula
- {\doglobal\settrue\insideplaceformula
+ {\global\settrue\insideplaceformula
\settrue\incrementformulanumber
\dodoubleempty\doplaceformula}
\unexpanded\def\placesubformula
- {\doglobal\settrue\insideplacesubformula
+ {\global
Hi,
I also ran into a problem with placeformula and margins. The attached
example runs fine with the margins. But as soon the placeformula is
uncommented the left and right margins are messed up. And if not all
paragraphs have at both side a marginnote is get worse. Is there a way to
solve
Hubertus wrote:
Hello again,
I've been offline for the last week, so I could'nd write. Thanks for your
answers!
Well my problem is, that I'm just some kind of ordinary user. I've no clue
about
tex. I've had a look into the conre-mat.tex and tried to compare it with your
posts. But, alas,
Hello again,
I've been offline for the last week, so I could'nd write. Thanks for your
answers!
Well my problem is, that I'm just some kind of ordinary user. I've no clue about
tex. I've had a look into the conre-mat.tex and tried to compare it with your
posts. But, alas, no success.
Is this a
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Hubertus Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
for some weeks I need to tex formulas again and tried the way I used to do it:
\placeformula
$$
f(t)={1\over2\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{i(\omega t-kx)} dx
$$
It didn't work anymore?!? It doesn't place a number nor does it do the spacing
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Hubertus Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
for some weeks I need to tex formulas again and tried the way I used to do
it:
\placeformula
$$
f(t)={1\over2\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{i(\omega t-kx)} dx
$$
It didn't work anymore
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
This is a bug in doplaceformula. I do not know how to avoid it, but
the next code illustrates what is happening.
\def\dotest{
\def\nextnext{$}%
\ifx\next\nextnext
Inside dispplaceformula\ldots % This always fails
\else
Inside
18 matches
Mail list logo
